Syllogism

Key Concepts & Formulas

Provide 5-7 essential concepts for Syllogism:

#ConceptQuick Explanation
1Universal Positive (All)Statement: “All A are B” = A is completely inside B circle
2Universal Negative (No)Statement: “No A is B” = Two circles completely separate
3Particular Positive (Some)Statement: “Some A are B” = Circles overlap partially
4Particular Negative (Some Not)Statement: “Some A are not B” = Part of A outside B
5Venn Diagram PriorityDraw circles for ALL statements first, then check conclusions
6Possibility Rule“Some” statements allow possibility of “All” being true
7Conclusion ValidityA conclusion is valid only if it MUST be true in all cases

10 Practice MCQs

Generate 10 MCQs with increasing difficulty (Q1-3: Easy, Q4-7: Medium, Q8-10: Hard)

Q1. Statements: All trains are vehicles. All vehicles have wheels. Conclusions: I. All trains have wheels. II. Some vehicles are trains. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Draw two concentric circles: Trains ⊂ Vehicles ⊂ Wheels

  • Conclusion I: Trains → Wheels (True, as trains ⊂ vehicles ⊂ wheels)
  • Conclusion II: Vehicles → Trains (True, as trains ⊂ vehicles, so some vehicles are trains)

Shortcut: If A⊂B⊂C, then A⊂C and B∩A=A

Concept: Syllogism - Transitive property

Q2. Statements: Some stations are junctions. No junction is a terminal. Conclusions: I. Some stations are not terminals. II. No terminal is a junction. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Draw overlapping circles: Stations ∩ Junctions ≠ ∅, Junctions ∩ Terminals = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Some stations (those that are junctions) are not terminals (True)
  • Conclusion II: If no junction is terminal, then no terminal is junction (True, same statement reversed)

Shortcut: “No A is B” = “No B is A”

Concept: Syllogism - Complementary statements

Q3. Statements: All express trains are fast. Some fast trains are superfast. Conclusions: I. Some express trains are superfast. II. All superfast are fast. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: Express ⊂ Fast, Fast ∩ Superfast ≠ ∅

  • Conclusion I: Possible (express trains could be in the intersection)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (some superfast could be outside fast)

Shortcut: “Some” allows possibility, doesn’t guarantee

Concept: Syllogism - Possibility vs certainty

Q4. Statements: All platforms are long. Some platforms are crowded. No crowded place is safe. Conclusions: I. Some long things are not safe. II. Some crowded platforms are long. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Platform ⊂ Long, Platform ∩ Crowded ≠ ∅, Crowded ∩ Safe = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Some long things (crowded platforms) are not safe (True)
  • Conclusion II: Some crowded platforms are long (True, as all platforms are long)

Shortcut: Combine statements: Platform → Long AND Platform ∩ Crowded → Long ∩ Crowded

Concept: Syllogism - Multiple statement combination

Q5. Statements: Some tickets are reserved. All reserved tickets are expensive. No expensive ticket is available. Conclusions: I. Some tickets are not available. II. No reserved ticket is available. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Ticket ∩ Reserved ≠ ∅, Reserved ⊂ Expensive, Expensive ∩ Available = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Some tickets (reserved ones) are expensive and thus not available (True)
  • Conclusion II: Reserved ⊂ Expensive ⊂ Not Available (True)

Shortcut: Chain: A∩B ⊂ C ⊂ D → A∩B ⊂ D

Concept: Syllogism - Extended chain reasoning

Q6. Statements: All drivers are employees. Some employees are graduates. No graduate is illiterate. Conclusions: I. Some drivers are graduates. II. No employee is illiterate. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: D) Neither follows

Solution: Driver ⊂ Employee, Employee ∩ Graduate ≠ ∅, Graduate ∩ Illiterate = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Not necessarily (drivers could be outside graduate circle)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (non-graduate employees could be illiterate)

Shortcut: Check if conclusion MUST be true in all possible arrangements

Concept: Syllogism - Non-mandatory conclusions

Q7. Statements: Some mail trains are delayed. All delayed trains are late. Some late trains are cancelled. Conclusions: I. Some mail trains are late. II. Some cancelled trains are mail trains. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: Mail ∩ Delayed ≠ ∅, Delayed ⊂ Late, Late ∩ Cancelled ≠ ∅

  • Conclusion I: Mail → Delayed → Late (True)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (cancelled trains could be from different category)

Shortcut: First conclusion in chain always follows if A∩B ⊂ C

Concept: Syllogism - Chain conclusion validity

Q8. Statements: All AC coaches are comfortable. Some comfortable coaches are expensive. No expensive coach is economical. Conclusions: I. Some AC coaches are not economical. II. No comfortable coach is economical. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: AC ⊂ Comfortable, Comfortable ∩ Expensive ≠ ∅, Expensive ∩ Economical = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Possible (AC coaches could be in expensive subset)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (comfortable coaches could be economical if not expensive)

Shortcut: Check if subset relationship forces the conclusion

Concept: Syllogism -Subset possibility analysis

Q9. Statements: Some passengers are daily travelers. All daily travelers have passes. Some pass holders are not season ticket holders. Conclusions: I. Some passengers are not season ticket holders. II. Some daily travelers are not season ticket holders. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Passenger ∩ Daily ≠ ∅, Daily ⊂ Pass, Pass ∩ ¬Season ≠ ∅

  • Conclusion I: Some passengers (daily travelers) have passes, and some pass holders are not season ticket holders (True)
  • Conclusion II: Daily travelers ⊂ Pass, and some pass holders are not season ticket holders (True)

Shortcut: If A∩B ⊂ C and C∩¬D ≠ ∅, then A∩B∩¬D possible

Concept: Syllogism - Complex subset analysis

Q10. Statements: All local trains stop at all stations. Some trains that stop at all stations are passenger trains. No passenger train is a superfast train. Conclusions: I. Some local trains are not superfast trains. II. All trains that stop at all stations are local trains. A) Only I follows B) Only II follows C) Both follow D) Neither follows

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: Local ⊂ Stop-all, Stop-all ∩ Passenger ≠ ∅, Passenger ∩ Superfast = ∅

  • Conclusion I: Local ⊂ Stop-all ⊂ ¬Superfast (True)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (passenger trains also stop at all stations)

Shortcut: Check if subset relationship is bidirectional

Concept: Syllogism - One-way vs two-way relationships

5 Previous Year Questions

Generate PYQ-style questions with authentic exam references:

PYQ 1. Statements: All birds are animals. Some animals are humans. Conclusions: I. Some birds are humans. II. All humans are animals. [RRB NTPC 2021 CBT-1]

Answer: D) Neither follows

Solution: Bird ⊂ Animal, Animal ∩ Human ≠ ∅

  • Conclusion I: Not necessarily (birds could be outside human circle)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (only some animals are humans)

Exam Tip: “Some” statements don’t allow “All” conclusions

PYQ 2. Statements: No pen is pencil. All pencils are erasers. Conclusions: I. Some erasers are not pens. II. No eraser is pen. [RRB Group D 2022]

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: Pen ∩ Pencil = ∅, Pencil ⊂ Eraser

  • Conclusion I: True (pencils are erasers but not pens)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (other erasers could be pens)

Exam Tip: Check if conclusion applies to entire set or subset

PYQ 3. Statements: Some doctors are teachers. All teachers are professors. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are professors. II. Some professors are doctors. [RRB ALP 2018]

Answer: C) Both follow

Solution: Doctor ∩ Teacher ≠ ∅, Teacher ⊂ Professor

  • Conclusion I: Doctor ∩ Teacher ⊂ Professor (True)
  • Conclusion II: Same as I, just reversed (True)

Exam Tip: “Some A are B” = “Some B are A”

PYQ 4. Statements: All books are pages. Some pages are covers. Conclusions: I. Some books are covers. II. Some covers are pages. [RRB JE 2019]

Answer: B) Only II follows

Solution: Book ⊂ Page, Page ∩ Cover ≠ ∅

  • Conclusion I: Not necessarily (books could be outside cover intersection)
  • Conclusion II: True (some pages are covers means some covers are pages)

Exam Tip: “Some” statements are reversible

PYQ 5. Statements: Some fruits are apples. No apple is vegetable. Conclusions: I. Some fruits are not vegetables. II. No fruit is vegetable. [RPF SI 2019]

Answer: A) Only I follows

Solution: Fruit ∩ Apple ≠ ∅, Apple ∩ Vegetable = ∅

  • Conclusion I: True (apple-fruits are not vegetables)
  • Conclusion II: Not necessarily (other fruits could be vegetables)

Exam Tip: Don’t overgeneralize from subset to whole set

Speed Tricks & Shortcuts

For Syllogism, provide exam-tested shortcuts:

SituationShortcutExample
All + All chainFirst ⊂ LastAll A are B + All B are C → All A are C
All + No combinationFirst ∩ Last = ∅All A are B + No B is C → No A is C
Some + All chainSome First ⊂ LastSome A are B + All B are C → Some A are C
No + Any statementNo conclusion possibleNo A is B + Any statement → No direct conclusion
Possibility checkingDraw minimal overlapIf conclusion can be false in any diagram → Invalid

Common Mistakes to Avoid

MistakeWhy Students Make ItCorrect Approach
Assuming “Some” means “All”Misinterpreting possibility as certainty“Some” means “at least one” not “all”
Reversing “All” statementsThinking “All A are B” = “All B are A”Only “Some” statements are reversible
Ignoring empty spaceForgetting circles can have elements outside othersAlways consider what exists outside each circle
Making universal from particularFrom “Some A are B” concluding “All A are B”Particular statements never prove universal ones
Not drawing diagramsTrying to solve mentally without visualizationAlways draw Venn diagrams for accuracy

Quick Revision Flashcards

Front (Question/Term)Back (Answer)
Universal PositiveAll A are B (A completely inside B)
Universal NegativeNo A is B (A and B completely separate)
Particular PositiveSome A are B (A and B overlap)
Particular NegativeSome A are not B (Part of A outside B)
Valid conclusionMust be true in ALL possible diagrams
PossibilityMay be true in at least one diagram
“Some” reversibilitySome A are B = Some B are A
“All” reversibilityAll A are B ≠ All B are A
Chain ruleIf A⊂B⊂C, then A⊂C
No statementNo A is B = No B is A

Topic Connections

How Syllogism connects to other RRB exam topics:

  • Direct Link: Analytical Reasoning - Both test logical deduction skills
  • Combined Questions: Often combined with Blood Relations (All mothers are women + Blood relation concepts)
  • Foundation For: Data Sufficiency questions build on syllogistic reasoning principles